Most agree that startups succeed best with a team of Cofounders, and I'll have to say I agree. Nothing is more exciting than getting one step closer to your goal, and doing so with your best buddies. Sharing is honestly half the fun, but it slows down the decision making. Now the major question, is that a good thing? I think yes.
Each step of the way, whether it be technical, administrative, or otherwise, you have to collaborate. Now my group initially decided that we would split the responsibilities up. Technical falling to one, creative to another, legal and financial to another, but that really hasn't held up. I think it is probably fear that causes us to break out and overreach, but also it's interest in the creation as a whole. If we wanted to do just one thing we would be content with a normal position in a normal company.
So maybe this too is a good thing, but it is so damn slow. The process of incorporating for example actually only took 10 minutes thanks to Clerky, but actually getting around to doing it and everyone agreeing on it took weeks, and in the end everyone didn't agree with it, one of us just moved forward and did it. I think that is what it is going to take.
Now I should note that we are not working in the same location. Not surprisingly, this makes things slower and more complicated. With that being said, there are plenty of tools that make it possible for us to still get things done.
I think the best way to get through all these decisions is to just motivate everyone to be decisive on their own, and if we need to huddle up we can do so, but not make that the standard. We all trust one another enough to do business together, so we are just going to have to trust ourselves to make decisions and move forward. I'd rather deal with our disagreements than deal with our procrastination.